We’re here to support researchers. Visit our COVID-19 page for links to emerging research, updates about our policies, and more resources related to the pandemic. View the page

We have updated our Privacy Policy. Read more

Read about our Cookie Policy. Learn more

When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open.

Published Peer Review History. What can you learn? 

Making the review process transparent gives the scientific community a chance to learn more about how other experts are reviewing manuscripts. Read robust examples of peer review, organized by manuscript section. 

The fact that more than 70% of respondents self-reported a lifetime mental health diagnosis strikes me as comparatively high and should be mentioned upfront in text when reporting sample descriptives. Likewise, 45% of respondents receiving current mental health treatment does seem equally elevated compared to general population stats and would also be worth reporting in text (as both have implications for sample representativeness).

Acute mental health responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia

View the full review

Figure 3 needs to be reworked or the data needs to be presented differently. The way it is presented in the manuscript is too complicated. It took me too long to figure out what all of the lines mean, and I’m still not sure that I understand what the figure is showing. Perhaps the authors can move this figure to the supplemental material and just show a simplified version of this figure in the manuscript. What does the negative and positive velocities indicate? Direction of motion?

Humans adapt their anticipatory eye movements to the volatility of visual motion properties

View the full review

I would argue that this section in general needs to be easier to interpret and more visual. I think most tables don’t necessarily need to be included in the results. Perhaps I would include them as an annex and only represent a summary of some of them in the results. For example, Table 2 could be summarized showing only the genus that co-occur with M. crassifolia, not all the species, or Table 4 could be easily summarized with a pie chart showing the different proportion of each life-form. 

Biodiversity conservation in cities: Defining habitat analogues for plant species of conservation interest

View the full review

Further Reading
Relevant Research
Back to top